I have the following code in Ruby. I want to convert this code into JavaScript. What is the equivalent code in JS?
text = <<"HERE"
This
Is
A
Multiline
String
HERE
I have the following code in Ruby. I want to convert this code into JavaScript. What is the equivalent code in JS?
text = <<"HERE"
This
Is
A
Multiline
String
HERE
ECMAScript 6 (ES6) introduces a new type of literal, namely template literals. They have many features, variable interpolation among others, but most importantly for this question, they can be multiline.
A template literal is delimited by backticks:
var html = `
<div>
<span>Some HTML here</span>
</div>
`;
(Note: I'm not advocating to use HTML in strings)
Browser support is OK, but you can use transpilers to be more compatible.
Javascript doesn't have a here-document syntax. You can escape the literal newline, however, which comes close:
"foo \
bar"
As the first answer mentions, with ES6/Babel, you can now create multi-line strings simply by using backticks:
const htmlString = `Say hello to
multi-line
strings!`;
Interpolating variables is a popular new feature that comes with back-tick delimited strings:
const htmlString = `${user.name} liked your post about strings`;
This just transpiles down to concatenation:
user.name + ' liked your post about strings'
Google's JavaScript style guide recommends to use string concatenation instead of escaping newlines:
Do not do this:
var myString = 'A rather long string of English text, an error message \ actually that just keeps going and going -- an error \ message to make the Energizer bunny blush (right through \ those Schwarzenegger shades)! Where was I? Oh yes, \ you\'ve got an error and all the extraneous whitespace is \ just gravy. Have a nice day.';
The whitespace at the beginning of each line can't be safely stripped at compile time; whitespace after the slash will result in tricky errors; and while most script engines support this, it is not part of ECMAScript.
Use string concatenation instead:
var myString = 'A rather long string of English text, an error message ' + 'actually that just keeps going and going -- an error ' + 'message to make the Energizer bunny blush (right through ' + 'those Schwarzenegger shades)! Where was I? Oh yes, ' + 'you\'ve got an error and all the extraneous whitespace is ' + 'just gravy. Have a nice day.';
the pattern text = <<"HERE" This Is A Multiline String HERE
is not available in js (I remember using it much in my good old Perl days).
To keep oversight with complex or long multiline strings I sometimes use an array pattern:
var myString =
['<div id="someId">',
'some content<br />',
'<a href="#someRef">someRefTxt</a>',
'</div>'
].join('\n');
or the pattern anonymous already showed (escape newline), which can be an ugly block in your code:
var myString =
'<div id="someId"> \
some content<br /> \
<a href="#someRef">someRefTxt</a> \
</div>';
Here's another weird but working 'trick'1:
var myString = (function () {/*
<div id="someId">
some content<br />
<a href="#someRef">someRefTxt</a>
</div>
*/}).toString().match(/[^]*\/\*([^]*)\*\/\}$/)[1];
external edit: jsfiddle
ES20xx supports spanning strings over multiple lines using template strings:
let str = `This is a text
with multiple lines.
Escapes are interpreted,
\n is a newline.`;
let str = String.raw`This is a text
with multiple lines.
Escapes are not interpreted,
\n is not a newline.`;
1 Note: this will be lost after minifying/obfuscating your code
You can have multiline strings in pure JavaScript.
This method is based on the serialization of functions, which is defined to be implementation-dependent. It does work in the most browsers (see below), but there's no guarantee that it will still work in the future, so do not rely on it.
Using the following function:
function hereDoc(f) {
return f.toString().
replace(/^[^\/]+\/\*!?/, '').
replace(/\*\/[^\/]+$/, '');
}
You can have here-documents like this:
var tennysonQuote = hereDoc(function() {/*!
Theirs not to make reply,
Theirs not to reason why,
Theirs but to do and die
*/});
The method has successfully been tested in the following browsers (not mentioned = not tested):
Be careful with your minifier, though. It tends to remove comments. For the YUI compressor, a comment starting with /*!
(like the one I used) will be preserved.
I think a real solution would be to use CoffeeScript.
ES6 UPDATE: You could use backtick instead of creating a function with a comment and running toString on the comment. The regex would need to be updated to only strip spaces. You could also have a string prototype method for doing this:
let foo = `
bar loves cake
baz loves beer
beer loves people
`.removeIndentation()
Someone should write this .removeIndentation string method... ;)
You can do this...
var string = 'This is\n' +
'a multiline\n' +
'string';
I came up with this very jimmy rigged method of a multi lined string. Since converting a function into a string also returns any comments inside the function you can use the comments as your string using a multilined comment /**/. You just have to trim off the ends and you have your string.
var myString = function(){/*
This is some
awesome multi-lined
string using a comment
inside a function
returned as a string.
Enjoy the jimmy rigged code.
*/}.toString().slice(14,-3)
alert(myString)
I'm surprised I didn't see this, because it works everywhere I've tested it and is very useful for e.g. templates:
<script type="bogus" id="multi">
My
multiline
string
</script>
<script>
alert($('#multi').html());
</script>
Does anybody know of an environment where there is HTML but it doesn't work?
I solved this by outputting a div, making it hidden, and calling the div id by jQuery when I needed it.
e.g.
<div id="UniqueID" style="display:none;">
Strings
On
Multiple
Lines
Here
</div>
Then when I need to get the string, I just use the following jQuery:
$('#UniqueID').html();
Which returns my text on multiple lines. If I call
alert($('#UniqueID').html());
I get:
There are multiple ways to achieve this
1. Slash concatenation
var MultiLine= '1\
2\
3\
4\
5\
6\
7\
8\
9';
2. regular concatenation
var MultiLine = '1'
+'2'
+'3'
+'4'
+'5';
3. Array Join concatenation
var MultiLine = [
'1',
'2',
'3',
'4',
'5'
].join('');
Performance wise, Slash concatenation (first one) is the fastest.
Refer this test case for more details regarding the performance
Update:
With the ES2015, we can take advantage of its Template strings feature. With it, we just need to use back-ticks for creating multi line strings
Example:
`<h1>{{title}}</h1>
<h2>{{hero.name}} details!</h2>
<div><label>id: </label>{{hero.id}}</div>
<div><label>name: </label>{{hero.name}}</div>
`
Using script tags:
<script>...</script>
block containing your multiline text into head
tag;get your multiline text as is... (watch out for text encoding: UTF-8, ASCII)
<script>
// pure javascript
var text = document.getElementById("mySoapMessage").innerHTML ;
// using JQuery's document ready for safety
$(document).ready(function() {
var text = $("#mySoapMessage").html();
});
</script>
<script id="mySoapMessage" type="text/plain">
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:typ="...">
<soapenv:Header/>
<soapenv:Body>
<typ:getConvocadosElement>
...
</typ:getConvocadosElement>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
<!-- this comment will be present on your string -->
//uh-oh, javascript comments... SOAP request will fail
</script>
I like this syntax and indendation:
string = 'my long string...\n'
+ 'continue here\n'
+ 'and here.';
(but actually can't be considered as multiline string)
There's this library that makes it beautiful:
https://github.com/sindresorhus/multiline
var str = '' +
'<!doctype html>' +
'<html>' +
' <body>' +
' <h1>❤ unicorns</h1>' +
' </body>' +
'</html>' +
'';
var str = multiline(function(){/*
<!doctype html>
<html>
<body>
<h1>❤ unicorns</h1>
</body>
</html>
*/});
Downvoters: This code is supplied for information only.
This has been tested in Fx 19 and Chrome 24 on Mac
var new_comment; /*<<<EOF
<li class="photobooth-comment">
<span class="username">
<a href="#">You</a>:
</span>
<span class="comment-text">
$text
</span>
@<span class="comment-time">
2d
</span> ago
</li>
EOF*/
// note the script tag here is hardcoded as the FIRST tag
new_comment=document.currentScript.innerHTML.split("EOF")[1];
document.querySelector("ul").innerHTML=new_comment.replace('$text','This is a dynamically created text');
<ul></ul>
The equivalent in javascript is:
var text = `
This
Is
A
Multiline
String
`;
Here's the specification. See browser support at the bottom of this page. Here are some examples too.
This works in IE, Safari, Chrome and Firefox:
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div class="crazy_idea" thorn_in_my_side='<table border="0">
<tr>
<td ><span class="mlayouttablecellsdynamic">PACKAGE price $65.00</span></td>
</tr>
</table>'></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
alert($(".crazy_idea").attr("thorn_in_my_side"));
</script>
to sum up, I have tried 2 approaches listed here in user javascript programming (Opera 11.01):
So I recommend the working approach for Opera user JS users. Unlike what the author was saying:
It doesn't work on firefox or opera; only on IE, chrome and safari.
It DOES work in Opera 11. At least in user JS scripts. Too bad I can't comment on individual answers or upvote the answer, I'd do it immediately. If possible, someone with higher privileges please do it for me.
My extension to https://stackoverflow.com/a/15558082/80404.
It expects comment in a form /*! any multiline comment */
where symbol ! is used to prevent removing by minification (at least for YUI compressor)
Function.prototype.extractComment = function() {
var startComment = "/*!";
var endComment = "*/";
var str = this.toString();
var start = str.indexOf(startComment);
var end = str.lastIndexOf(endComment);
return str.slice(start + startComment.length, -(str.length - end));
};
Example:
var tmpl = function() { /*!
<div class="navbar-collapse collapse">
<ul class="nav navbar-nav">
</ul>
</div>
*/}.extractComment();
Updated for 2015: it's six years later now: most people use a module loader, and the main module systems each have ways of loading templates. It's not inline, but the most common type of multiline string are templates, and templates should generally be kept out of JS anyway.
Using require.js 'text' plugin, with a multiline template in template.html
var template = require('text!template.html')
Browserify uses a 'brfs' module to load text files. This will actually build your template into your bundled HTML.
var fs = require("fs");
var template = fs.readFileSync(template.html', 'utf8');
Easy.
If you're willing to use the escaped newlines, they can be used nicely. It looks like a document with a page border.
The ES6 way of doing it would be by using template literals:
const str = `This
is
a
multiline text`;
console.log(str);
More reference here
You can use TypeScript (JavaScript SuperSet), it supports multiline strings, and transpiles back down to pure JavaScript without overhead:
var templates = {
myString: `this is
a multiline
string`
}
alert(templates.myString);
If you'd want to accomplish the same with plain JavaScript:
var templates =
{
myString: function(){/*
This is some
awesome multi-lined
string using a comment
inside a function
returned as a string.
Enjoy the jimmy rigged code.
*/}.toString().slice(14,-3)
}
alert(templates.myString)
Note that the iPad/Safari does not support 'functionName.toString()'
If you have a lot of legacy code, you can also use the plain JavaScript variant in TypeScript (for cleanup purposes):
interface externTemplates
{
myString:string;
}
declare var templates:externTemplates;
alert(templates.myString)
and you can use the multiline-string object from the plain JavaScript variant, where you put the templates into another file (which you can merge in the bundle).
You can try TypeScript at
http://www.typescriptlang.org/Playground
Easiest way to make multiline strings in Javascrips is with the use of backticks ( `` ). This allows you to create multiline strings in which you can insert variables with ${variableName}
.
let name = 'Willem';
let age = 26;
let multilineString = `
my name is: ${name}
my age is: ${age}
`;
console.log(multilineString);
ES6
//es2015
ES6 allows you to use a backtick to specify a string on multiple lines. It's called a Template Literal. Like this:
var multilineString = `One line of text
second line of text
third line of text
fourth line of text`;
Using the backtick works in NodeJS, and it's supported by Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, and Opera.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Template_literals
Also do note that, when extending string over multiple lines using forward backslash at end of each line, any extra characters (mostly spaces, tabs and comments added by mistake) after forward backslash will cause unexpected character error, which i took an hour to find out
var string = "line1\ // comment, space or tabs here raise error
line2";
Please for the love of the internet use string concatenation and opt not to use ES6 solutions for this. ES6 is NOT supported all across the board, much like CSS3 and certain browsers being slow to adapt to the CSS3 movement. Use plain ol' JavaScript, your end users will thank you.
Example:
var str = "This world is neither flat nor round. "+
"Once was lost will be found";
My version of array-based join for string concat:
var c = []; //c stands for content
c.push("<div id='thisDiv' style='left:10px'></div>");
c.push("<div onclick='showDo(\'something\');'></div>");
$(body).append(c.join('\n'));
This has worked well for me, especially as I often insert values into the html constructed this way. But it has lots of limitations. Indentation would be nice. Not having to deal with nested quotation marks would be really nice, and just the bulkyness of it bothers me.
Is the .push() to add to the array taking up a lot of time? See this related answer:
(Is there a reason JavaScript developers don't use Array.push()?)
After looking at these (opposing) test runs, it looks like .push() is fine for string arrays which will not likely grow over 100 items - I will avoid it in favor of indexed adds for larger arrays.
You can use +=
to concatenate your string, seems like no one answered that, which will be readable, and also neat... something like this
var hello = 'hello' +
'world' +
'blah';
can be also written as
var hello = 'hello';
hello += ' world';
hello += ' blah';
console.log(hello);
You have to use the concatenation operator '+'.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Document</title>
</head>
<body>
<p id="demo"></p>
<script>
var str = "This "
+ "\n<br>is "
+ "\n<br>multiline "
+ "\n<br>string.";
document.getElementById("demo").innerHTML = str;
</script>
</body>
</html>
By using \n
your source code will look like -
This <br>is <br>multiline <br>string.
By using <br>
your browser output will look like -
This is multiline string.
Ruby produce: "This\nIs\nA\nMultiline\nString\n"
- below JS produce exact same string
text = `This
Is
A
Multiline
String
`
// TEST
console.log(JSON.stringify(text));
console.log(text);
This is improvement to Lonnie Best answer because new-line characters in his answer are not exactly the same positions as in ruby output
I think this workaround should work in IE, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera -
Using jQuery :
<xmp id="unique_id" style="display:none;">
Some plain text
Both type of quotes : " ' " And ' " '
JS Code : alert("Hello World");
HTML Code : <div class="some_class"></div>
</xmp>
<script>
alert($('#unique_id').html());
</script>
Using Pure Javascript :
<xmp id="unique_id" style="display:none;">
Some plain text
Both type of quotes : " ' " And ' " '
JS Code : alert("Hello World");
HTML Code : <div class="some_class"></div>
</xmp>
<script>
alert(document.getElementById('unique_id').innerHTML);
</script>
Cheers!!
Retrieved from : http:www.stackoverflow.com/questions/805107/creating-multiline-strings-in-javascript
How can I convert a string to boolean in JavaScript? (0) | 2023.06.10 |
---|---|
How do I iterate over the words of a string? (0) | 2023.06.10 |
event.preventDefault() vs. return false (0) | 2023.06.10 |
How do I loop through or enumerate a JavaScript object? (0) | 2023.06.10 |
Commit only part of a file in Git (0) | 2023.06.10 |